Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLCX
FDLSX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLCX
FDLSX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 477M vs. RYLCX (6.1M). FDLSX pays higher dividends than RYLCX: FDLSX (0.55) vs RYLCX (0.08). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FDLSX (42 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.68). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FDLSX (65.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLCX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.10 vs. FDLSX (-17.68). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : -11.32 vs. FDLSX (-11.91).
| FDLSX | RYLCX | FDLSX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.466 | -3.633 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 477M | 6.1M | 7,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.08 | 690% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.68 | -2.10 | 840% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.57 | 29.60 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.91 | -11.32 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.85 | 47.49 | 71% |