Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGACX
FDNRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGACX
FDNRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FDNRX (30.9B). FDNRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGACX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). FDNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.78 vs. RGACX (14.24). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.53 vs. RGACX (22.53).
| FDNRX | RGACX | FDNRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.909 | 10.291 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9B | 338B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.78 | 14.24 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.25 | 51.07 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.53 | 22.53 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.77 | 107.79 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers