Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGACX
FDNRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGACX
FDNRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDNRX (29.7B). FDNRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGACX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). FDNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.39 vs. RGACX (3.68). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 29.10 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| FDNRX | RGACX | FDNRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.521 | 6.959 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.39 | 3.68 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.92 | 37.13 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.10 | 13.46 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 305.20 | 97.58 | 313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement