Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGACX
FDNRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGACX
FDNRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDNRX (28.6B). FDNRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGACX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. FDNRX (-3.44). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 17.69 vs. RGACX (10.82).
| FDNRX | RGACX | FDNRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.057 | 8.819 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | -0.53 | 647% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.15 | 40.68 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.69 | 10.82 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.95 | 101.31 | 281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers