Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGAFX
FDNRX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGAFX
FDNRX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDNRX (30B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FDNRX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FDNRX (0.00). FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGAFX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). FDNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. RGAFX (12.49). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 32.41 vs. RGAFX (20.71).
| FDNRX | RGAFX | FDNRX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.34 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.34 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.626 | 8.854 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.07 | 12.49 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.55 | 50.06 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.41 | 20.71 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 334.60 | 121.55 | 275% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement