Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGAFX
FDNRX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGAFX
FDNRX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDNRX (29.7B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FDNRX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FDNRX (0.00). FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGAFX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). FDNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.39 vs. RGAFX (4.67). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 29.10 vs. RGAFX (17.46).
| FDNRX | RGAFX | FDNRX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.34 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.34 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.521 | 7.299 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.39 | 4.67 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.92 | 40.73 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.10 | 17.46 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 305.20 | 105.95 | 288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement