Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGAFX
FDNRX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGAFX
FDNRX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FDNRX (30.9B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FDNRX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FDNRX (0.00). FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGAFX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). FDNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.78 vs. RGAFX (15.34). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.53 vs. RGAFX (26.83).
| FDNRX | RGAFX | FDNRX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.34 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.34 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.909 | 10.570 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9B | 338B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.78 | 15.34 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.25 | 55.04 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.53 | 26.83 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.77 | 116.58 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers