Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGAGX
FDNRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGAGX
FDNRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDNRX (30B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FDNRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FDNRX (0.00). FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGAGX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). FDNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. RGAGX (12.55). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 32.41 vs. RGAGX (20.99).
| FDNRX | RGAGX | FDNRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.626 | 8.887 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.07 | 12.55 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.55 | 50.34 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.41 | 20.99 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 334.60 | 122.10 | 274% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement