Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGAGX
FDNRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGAGX
FDNRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FDNRX (30.9B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FDNRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FDNRX (0.00). FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FDNRX (18 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FDNRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGAGX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). FDNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.78 vs. RGAGX (15.41). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.53 vs. RGAGX (27.14).
| FDNRX | RGAGX | FDNRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.909 | 10.599 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9B | 338B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.78 | 15.41 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.25 | 55.31 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.53 | 27.14 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.77 | 117.06 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement