FDP vs IPAR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDP is a Buy and IPAR is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPAR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IPAR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FDP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPAR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FDP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IPAR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FDP (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а +7.87% price change this week, while IPAR (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +5.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.67%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
FDP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
IPAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+1.17% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.18% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| FDP | IPAR | FDP / IPAR | |
| Capitalization | 1.23B | 4.5B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 125M | 278M | 45% |
| Gain YTD | 4.222 | -17.615 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.18 | 29.13 | 35% |
| Revenue | 4.32B | 1.32B | 328% |
| Total Cash | 33.8M | 183M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 598M | 192M | 311% |
FDP | IPAR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDP's Valuation (30) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IPAR (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that FDP’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as FDP (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to FDP’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's SMR Rating (41) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDP (78) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDP’s over the last 12 months.
FDP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPAR (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that FDP’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as FDP (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to FDP’s over the last 12 months.
| FDP | IPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 60% | 9 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 64% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BAUG | 41.18 | 0.51 | +1.24% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF Aug | |||
| PYZ | 80.96 | 0.96 | +1.20% |
| Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF | |||
| RSPU | 69.15 | 0.26 | +0.38% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF | |||
| SPBO | 28.47 | 0.08 | +0.28% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| REAI | 18.97 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
| Intelligent Real Estate ETF | |||
FDP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDP has been loosely correlated with DOLE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDP jumps, then DOLE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDP | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| DOLE - FDP | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| TSN - FDP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ADM - FDP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| ALCO - FDP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| LMNR - FDP | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||
IPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAR has been loosely correlated with COTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPAR jumps, then COTY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| COTY - IPAR | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| SPB - IPAR | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| EPC - IPAR | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| ELF - IPAR | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.73% | ||
| EL - IPAR | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
More | ||||