Advertisement
IPAR vs SPB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAR is a Hold and SPB is a Hold.
IPAR | SPB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SPB's Valuation (27) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as IPAR (28) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that SPB’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPB (100) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPB’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's SMR Rating (47) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPB (84) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPB’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SPB (53) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to SPB’s over the last 12 months.
IPAR's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SPB (31) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to SPB’s over the last 12 months.
| IPAR | SPB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IPAR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SPB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- IPAR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SPB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IPAR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IPAR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SPB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
IPAR (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while SPB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
IPAR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
SPB is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+3.14% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MXI | 109.08 | 1.48 | +1.38% |
| iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) | |||
| LEGR | 65.13 | 0.42 | +0.65% |
| First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) | |||
| DECZ | 44.59 | 0.24 | +0.54% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) | |||
| XEML | 24.17 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF | |||
| ITB | 84.76 | -1.11 | -1.29% |
| iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) | |||
What’s the Difference Between Data Analytics and Machine Learning?
Top Performers of June 25, 2025: AI Trading Revolution with New FLMs and 5-Minute Virtual Agents
What Are Black Swan Events in Investing?
The Samsung Empire Forecast 2030: Why This +$1 Trillion Korean Giant Could Become One of the Most Underpriced AI, Semiconductor, Robotics, and Infrastructure Empires on Earth
41 Stocks Just Hit New 52-Week Lows at the Same Time. Tickeron AI Sorts the Bargains From the Value Traps
IPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAR has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPAR jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| PG - IPAR | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| CLX - IPAR | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| EL - IPAR | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| SPB - IPAR | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| KMB - IPAR | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
SPB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPB has been loosely correlated with EPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPB jumps, then EPC could also see price increases.