FDSB
Price
$18.31
Change
-$0.18 (-0.97%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
96.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFS
Price
$23.06
Change
-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDSB vs PFS

FDSB vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDSB vs. PFS commentary
Sep 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSB is a Hold and PFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($3.02B) has a higher market cap than FDSB($96.7M). FDSB has higher P/E ratio than PFS: FDSB (54.32) vs PFS (9.65). FDSB YTD gains are higher at: 22.067 vs. PFS (20.448). FDSB has less debt than PFS: FDSB (0) vs PFS (2.73B). PFS has higher revenues than FDSB: PFS (907M) vs FDSB (15M).
FDSBPFSFDSB / PFS
Capitalization96.7M3.02B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.06720.448108%
P/E Ratio54.329.65563%
Revenue15M907M2%
Total CashN/A211M-
Total Debt02.73B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSBPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2026
Stock price -- (FDSB: $18.31 vs. PFS: $23.06)
Brand notoriety: FDSB and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDSB: 191% vs. PFS: 189%
Market capitalization -- FDSB: $96.7M vs. PFS: $3.02B
FDSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $96.7M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $171.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDSB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than FDSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDSB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDSB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than FDSB.

Price Growth

FDSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.03% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FDSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYTTX461.40N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy A
ODINX96.00N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery R
STMPX26.98N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Y(SIMT)
TFIFX50.26N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
LFTPX13.12N/A
N/A
Lincoln U.S. Equity Income Maximizer I