Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDSSX vs RGAFX
FDSSX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDSSX vs RGAFX
FDSSX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDSSX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSSX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDSSX (11.3B). RGAFX (0.46) and FDSSX (0.45) have matching dividends . FDSSX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FDSSX (36 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FDSSX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDSSX (13.00). FDSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FDSSX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FDSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.76 vs. RGAFX (0.42). FDSSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.35 vs. RGAFX (14.74).
| FDSSX | RGAFX | FDSSX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.34 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.34 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | 9.276 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.76 | 0.42 | 4,483% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.00 | 44.36 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.35 | 14.74 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.76 | 109.80 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers