Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDSVX vs RGACX
FDSVX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDSVX vs RGACX
FDSVX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDSVX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSVX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDSVX (6.84B). FDSVX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FDSVX (0.15) vs RGACX (0.00). FDSVX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDSVX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FDSVX (0.62). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FDSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FDSVX (0) vs RGACX (250). FDSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.43 vs. RGACX (7.94). FDSVX return over 5 years is better than : 36.57 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| FDSVX | RGACX | FDSVX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.93 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.93 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.050 | 6.185 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.43 | 7.94 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.29 | 43.05 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.57 | 13.23 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 232.87 | 107.97 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement