Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDSVX vs RGACX
FDSVX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDSVX vs RGACX
FDSVX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDSVX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSVX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDSVX (6.75B). FDSVX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FDSVX (0.15) vs RGACX (0.00). FDSVX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDSVX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FDSVX (0.62). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FDSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FDSVX (0) vs RGACX (250). FDSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.52 vs. RGACX (3.68). FDSVX return over 5 years is better than : 32.43 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| FDSVX | RGACX | FDSVX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.93 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.93 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.975 | 6.959 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.52 | 3.68 | 503% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.91 | 37.13 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.43 | 13.46 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 211.53 | 97.58 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement