Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDSVX vs RGAHX
FDSVX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDSVX vs RGAHX
FDSVX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDSVX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSVX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDSVX (6.52B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDSVX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FDSVX (0.00). FDSVX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDSVX (28 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDSVX (0.53) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDSVX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RGAHX (0.18). FDSVX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| FDSVX | RGAHX | FDSVX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.44 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.44 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.767 | 9.200 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.52B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 0.18 | 5,887% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.57 | 43.47 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.80 | 13.78 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.06 | 106.68 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement