Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDSVX vs RGAHX
FDSVX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDSVX vs RGAHX
FDSVX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDSVX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSVX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDSVX (6.75B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDSVX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FDSVX (0.15). FDSVX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDSVX (28 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDSVX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDSVX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.52 vs. RGAHX (4.43). FDSVX return over 5 years is better than : 32.43 vs. RGAHX (16.49).
| FDSVX | RGAHX | FDSVX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.44 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.44 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.975 | 7.244 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.40 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.52 | 4.43 | 418% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.91 | 39.88 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.43 | 16.49 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 211.53 | 102.84 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement