Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDSVX vs RGEBX
FDSVX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDSVX vs RGEBX
FDSVX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDSVX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSVX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDSVX (6.52B). FDSVX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FDSVX (0.00) vs RGEBX (0.00). FDSVX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDSVX (28 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FDSVX (0.53). FDSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FDSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FDSVX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FDSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FDSVX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FDSVX | RGEBX | FDSVX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.08 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.08 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.767 | 8.727 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.52B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | -0.77 | -1,366% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.57 | 39.77 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.80 | 9.71 | 369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.06 | 97.58 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement