Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTCX vs RGAHX
FDTCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDTCX vs RGAHX
FDTCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDTCX (4.21B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDTCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FDTCX (0.00). FDTCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDTCX (21 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDTCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDTCX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. RGAHX (0.18). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. FDTCX (4.47).
| FDTCX | RGAHX | FDTCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.44 | 364% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.44 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.126 | 9.200 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 0.18 | 4,386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.20 | 43.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.47 | 13.78 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.34 | 106.68 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement