Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTCX vs RGEBX
FDTCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDTCX vs RGEBX
FDTCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDTCX (4.24B). FDTCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDTCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDTCX (21 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). FDTCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). FDTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FDTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FDTCX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FDTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.21 vs. RGEBX (11.13). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. FDTCX (9.51).
| FDTCX | RGEBX | FDTCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.08 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.08 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.989 | 8.479 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.21 | 11.13 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.41 | 45.29 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.51 | 15.42 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.70 | 108.69 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement