Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTEX vs RGAHX
FDTEX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDTEX vs RGAHX
FDTEX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTEX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTEX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDTEX (4.27B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDTEX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FDTEX (0.00). FDTEX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDTEX (21 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDTEX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDTEX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. RGAHX (0.41). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 12.16 vs. FDTEX (10.44).
| FDTEX | RGAHX | FDTEX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.44 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.44 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.318 | 4.758 | 259% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | 0.41 | 3,189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.28 | 36.85 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.44 | 12.16 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.97 | 98.65 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement