Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTEX vs RGAHX
FDTEX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDTEX vs RGAHX
FDTEX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTEX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTEX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDTEX (4.24B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDTEX: RGAHX (0.39) vs FDTEX (0.00). FDTEX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDTEX (21 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDTEX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDTEX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. RGAHX (8.63). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. FDTEX (13.04).
| FDTEX | RGAHX | FDTEX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.44 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.44 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.682 | 6.676 | 190% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 8.63 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.46 | 45.32 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.04 | 18.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.60 | 109.21 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement