Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTFX vs FSNOX
FDTFX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTFX vs. FSNOX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTFX is a Hold and FSNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. FDTFX (1.11B). FSNOX pays higher dividends than FDTFX: FSNOX (2.41) vs FDTFX (1.90). FDTFX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: FDTFX (22 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FDTFX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSNOX (0.49). FDTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSNOX (14.00). FDTFX (0) and FSNOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.87 vs. FDTFX (4.82). FSNOX return over 5 years is better than : 7.23 vs. FDTFX (3.97).
| FDTFX | FSNOX | FDTFX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.49 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.49 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.217 | 10.846 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 13B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 2.41 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.82 | 6.87 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.83 | 37.62 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.97 | 7.23 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement