Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTFX vs FSNOX
FDTFX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTFX vs. FSNOX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTFX is a Hold and FSNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. FDTFX (1.1B). FSNOX pays higher dividends than FDTFX: FSNOX (2.59) vs FDTFX (2.03). FDTFX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: FDTFX (22 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FDTFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSNOX (0.49). FDTFX (14.00) and FSNOX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FDTFX (0) and FSNOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. FDTFX (4.22). FSNOX return over 5 years is better than : 8.93 vs. FDTFX (5.91).
| FDTFX | FSNOX | FDTFX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.49 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.49 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.696 | 2.604 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 12.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 2.59 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 5.65 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 13.61 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.91 | 8.93 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers