Ad is loading...
FDTGX vs RYCAX
FDTGX vs RYCAX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCAX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$83.92
Change-$0.90 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
Rydex Consumer Products H
Price$115.80
Change-$1.05 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63M
FDTGX vs RYCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYCAX (39.6M). RYCAX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCAX (1.93) vs FDTGX (1.57). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCAX: FDTGX (18 years) vs RYCAX (27 years). RYCAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.23). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RYCAX (43.00). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCAX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCAX (2500). RYCAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCAX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). RYCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.97 vs. FDTGX (-1.90). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.92 vs. RYCAX (-21.01).
| FDTGX | RYCAX | FDTGX / RYCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.65 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.381 | 2.365 | -101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 39.6M | 3,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.93 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.90 | -0.97 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.48 | -23.97 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.92 | -21.01 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.50 | -24.64 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers