Ad is loading...
FDTGX vs RYCAX
FDTGX vs RYCAX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCAX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$84.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
Rydex Consumer Products H
Price$116.66
Change-$0.31 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.27M
FDTGX vs RYCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. RYCAX (39.3M). RYCAX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCAX (1.94) vs FDTGX (1.43). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCAX: FDTGX (18 years) vs RYCAX (27 years). RYCAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX (45.00) and RYCAX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCAX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCAX (2500). RYCAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCAX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). RYCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.34 vs. FDTGX (-6.93). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 18.50 vs. RYCAX (-20.36).
| FDTGX | RYCAX | FDTGX / RYCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.65 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.646 | 2.470 | -107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 39.3M | 3,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.94 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.93 | -5.34 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.63 | -21.67 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.50 | -20.36 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.14 | -24.11 | 17% |