Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs RYCAX
FDTGX vs RYCAX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCAX
FDTGX vs RYCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. RYCAX (30.5M). RYCAX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCAX (1.84) vs FDTGX (1.32). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCAX: FDTGX (20 years) vs RYCAX (28 years). RYCAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCAX (45.00). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCAX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCAX (2500). RYCAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCAX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.79 vs. RYCAX (-16.39). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 0.70 vs. RYCAX (-42.14).
| FDTGX | RYCAX | FDTGX / RYCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.64 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.69 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.412 | 8.360 | 137% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 30.5M | 4,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | -16.39 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.57 | -28.75 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.70 | -42.14 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.06 | -43.83 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement