Ad is loading...
FDTGX vs RYCPX
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCPX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$85.88
Change-$0.42 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
Rydex Consumer Products C
Price$86.68
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.99M
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCPX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYCPX (40M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCPX (2.58) vs FDTGX (1.57). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDTGX (18 years) vs RYCPX (24 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.23). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RYCPX (43.00). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.75 vs. RYCPX (-5.88). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.08 vs. RYCPX (-30.86).
| FDTGX | RYCPX | FDTGX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.40 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.43 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.677 | 3.741 | -18% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 40M | 3,158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 2.58 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.75 | -5.88 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.44 | -30.56 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.08 | -30.86 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.31 | -39.02 | 8% |