Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs RYCPX
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCPX
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCPX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. RYCPX (30.4M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCPX (2.51) vs FDTGX (1.27). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDTGX (20 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCPX (45.00). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.09 vs. RYCPX (-24.55). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.63 vs. RYCPX (-54.40).
| FDTGX | RYCPX | FDTGX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.38 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.43 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.826 | 7.914 | 175% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 30.4M | 4,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.51 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.09 | -24.55 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.28 | -39.44 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.63 | -54.40 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.49 | -58.47 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement