Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs RYCPX
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCPX
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Hold and RYCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. RYCPX (29.9M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCPX (2.60) vs FDTGX (1.35). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDTGX (19 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). RYCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FDTGX (52.00). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.92 vs. RYCPX (-28.12). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : -3.69 vs. RYCPX (-58.09).
| FDTGX | RYCPX | FDTGX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.38 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.43 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.075 | 2.280 | 310% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 29.9M | 4,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 2.60 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | -28.12 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.90 | -42.18 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.69 | -58.09 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.37 | -59.17 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement