Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs RYCPX
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCPX
FDTGX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCPX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a StrongBuy and RYCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYCPX (30.4M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCPX (2.50) vs FDTGX (1.26). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDTGX (20 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCPX (45.00). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. RYCPX (-22.13). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.97 vs. RYCPX (-53.55).
| FDTGX | RYCPX | FDTGX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.38 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.43 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.635 | 9.373 | 156% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 30.4M | 4,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 2.50 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | -22.13 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.33 | -37.11 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.97 | -53.55 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.04 | -57.67 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement