Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs RYPDX
FDTGX vs RYPDX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYPDX
FDTGX vs RYPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYPDX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Hold and RYPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. RYPDX (29.9M). RYPDX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYPDX (1.75) vs FDTGX (1.35). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYPDX: FDTGX (19 years) vs RYPDX (22 years). RYPDX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). RYPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FDTGX (52.00). RYPDX initial investment is less costly to investors than FDTGX (4%) vs FDTGX (4%). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPDX: FDTGX (0) vs RYPDX (2500). RYPDX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYPDX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.92 vs. RYPDX (-20.06). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : -3.69 vs. RYPDX (-44.76).
| FDTGX | RYPDX | FDTGX / RYPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.64 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.69 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.075 | 2.589 | 273% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 29.9M | 4,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.75 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | -20.06 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.90 | -29.69 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.69 | -44.76 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.37 | -41.34 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement