Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs RYPDX
FDTGX vs RYPDX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYPDX
FDTGX vs RYPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYPDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYPDX (31.6M). RYPDX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYPDX (1.67) vs FDTGX (1.26). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYPDX: FDTGX (20 years) vs RYPDX (22 years). RYPDX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYPDX (45.00). RYPDX initial investment is less costly to investors than FDTGX (4%) vs FDTGX (4%). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPDX: FDTGX (0) vs RYPDX (2500). RYPDX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYPDX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.27 vs. RYPDX (-16.53). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 0.29 vs. RYPDX (-40.12).
| FDTGX | RYPDX | FDTGX / RYPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.64 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.69 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.101 | 5.751 | 193% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 31.6M | 3,972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.67 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.27 | -16.53 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.41 | -25.90 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.29 | -40.12 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.36 | -38.92 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers