Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTOX vs RGAHX
FDTOX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDTOX vs RGAHX
FDTOX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTOX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTOX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDTOX (4.27B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDTOX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FDTOX (0.20). FDTOX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDTOX (27 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDTOX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDTOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDTOX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. RGAHX (-0.41). FDTOX (11.77) and RGAHX (11.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FDTOX | RGAHX | FDTOX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.460 | 3.887 | 295% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.40 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | -0.41 | -2,975% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.87 | 35.06 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.77 | 11.23 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.03 | 96.26 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement