Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTOX vs RGAHX
FDTOX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDTOX vs RGAHX
FDTOX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTOX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTOX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FDTOX (4.24B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDTOX: RGAHX (0.39) vs FDTOX (0.20). FDTOX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDTOX (27 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDTOX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDTOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDTOX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.26 vs. RGAHX (15.06). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 25.77 vs. FDTOX (18.20).
| FDTOX | RGAHX | FDTOX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.994 | 10.512 | 133% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.39 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.26 | 15.06 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.51 | 54.07 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.20 | 25.77 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.72 | 113.26 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers