Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTOX vs RGAHX
FDTOX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDTOX vs RGAHX
FDTOX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTOX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTOX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FDTOX (4.21B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDTOX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FDTOX (0.20). FDTOX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDTOX (27 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDTOX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDTOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDTOX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.18 vs. RGAHX (4.58). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. FDTOX (10.70).
| FDTOX | RGAHX | FDTOX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.196 | 10.449 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 342B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.40 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.18 | 4.58 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.31 | 44.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.70 | 13.82 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.45 | 104.78 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement