Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTOX vs RGEBX
FDTOX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDTOX vs RGEBX
FDTOX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTOX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTOX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDTOX (4.27B). FDTOX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FDTOX (0.20) vs RGEBX (0.00). FDTOX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDTOX (27 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FDTOX (0.76). FDTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FDTOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FDTOX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FDTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. RGEBX (-1.37). FDTOX return over 5 years is better than : 11.77 vs. RGEBX (7.25).
| FDTOX | RGEBX | FDTOX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.08 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.08 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.460 | 3.522 | 325% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | -1.37 | -898% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.87 | 31.56 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.77 | 7.25 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.03 | 87.68 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement