Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTRX vs GFAFX
FDTRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDTRX vs GFAFX
FDTRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTRX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDTRX (29.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FDTRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FDTRX (0.00). FDTRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDTRX (13 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FDTRX (0.44). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDTRX (29.61). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDTRX: GFAFX (250) vs FDTRX (1000000). FDTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. GFAFX (8.46). FDTRX return over 5 years is better than : 39.41 vs. GFAFX (18.04).
| FDTRX | GFAFX | FDTRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.65 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.65 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.001 | 6.581 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.1B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 8.46 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.18 | 44.57 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.41 | 18.04 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 342.82 | 108.81 | 315% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement