Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTRX vs GFAFX
FDTRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDTRX vs GFAFX
FDTRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTRX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDTRX (28.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FDTRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FDTRX (0.00). FDTRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDTRX (13 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FDTRX (0.44). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDTRX (29.61). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDTRX: GFAFX (250) vs FDTRX (1000000). FDTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.66 vs. GFAFX (0.26). FDTRX return over 5 years is better than : 25.55 vs. GFAFX (11.44).
| FDTRX | GFAFX | FDTRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.65 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.65 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.197 | 4.647 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.7B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.66 | 0.26 | 1,428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.41 | 36.14 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.55 | 11.44 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 316.92 | 98.31 | 322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement