Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTRX vs RGACX
FDTRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDTRX vs RGACX
FDTRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTRX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDTRX (29.1B). FDTRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDTRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDTRX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FDTRX (0.44). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDTRX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDTRX: RGACX (250) vs FDTRX (1000000). FDTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. RGACX (7.86). FDTRX return over 5 years is better than : 39.41 vs. RGACX (15.76).
| FDTRX | RGACX | FDTRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.93 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.001 | 6.443 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.1B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 7.86 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.18 | 42.49 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.41 | 15.76 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 342.82 | 103.85 | 330% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers