FDUS
Price
$19.54
Change
-$0.86 (-4.22%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
620.35M
47 days until earnings call
OXSQ
Price
$2.28
Change
-$0.03 (-1.30%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
189.16M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDUS vs OXSQ

Header iconFDUS vs OXSQ Comparison
Open Charts FDUS vs OXSQBanner chart's image
Fidus Investment
Price$19.54
Change-$0.86 (-4.22%)
Volume$206.78K
Capitalization620.35M
Oxford Square Capital
Price$2.28
Change-$0.03 (-1.30%)
Volume$651.65K
Capitalization189.16M
FDUS vs OXSQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDUS vs. OXSQ commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDUS is a StrongBuy and OXSQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FDUS: $19.54 vs. OXSQ: $2.28)
Brand notoriety: FDUS and OXSQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDUS: 116% vs. OXSQ: 129%
Market capitalization -- FDUS: $620.35M vs. OXSQ: $189.16M
FDUS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $620.35M. OXSQ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $189.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDUS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileOXSQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDUS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • OXSQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDUS is a better buy in the long-term than OXSQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDUS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXSQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OXSQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OXSQ is a better buy in the short-term than FDUS.

Price Growth

FDUS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while OXSQ (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDUS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

OXSQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDUS($620M) has a higher market cap than OXSQ($189M). OXSQ has higher P/E ratio than FDUS: OXSQ (9.78) vs FDUS (6.69). OXSQ YTD gains are higher at: -0.152 vs. FDUS (-2.009). OXSQ has less debt than FDUS: OXSQ (123M) vs FDUS (467M). FDUS has higher revenues than OXSQ: FDUS (88M) vs OXSQ (22.6M).
FDUSOXSQFDUS / OXSQ
Capitalization620M189M328%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.009-0.1521,322%
P/E Ratio6.699.7868%
Revenue88M22.6M389%
Total CashN/A954K-
Total Debt467M123M380%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDUS vs OXSQ: Fundamental Ratings
FDUS
OXSQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
737
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1040
SMR RATING
1..100
1253
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5477
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
244
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OXSQ's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as FDUS (6). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to FDUS’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as OXSQ (40). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OXSQ (53). This means that FDUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as OXSQ (77). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

OXSQ's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FDUS (24). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to FDUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDUSOXSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRGIX10.53N/A
N/A
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate I
TOCQX48.31N/A
N/A
Tocqueville
ODIYX120.23N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery Y
UIVRX12.49N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R6
VWYKX40.02N/A
N/A
Voya Small Cap Growth W

FDUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDUS has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDUS jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDUS
1D Price
Change %
FDUS100%
-1.61%
FSK - FDUS
82%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
ARCC - FDUS
81%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
NMFC - FDUS
81%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
GBDC - FDUS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
GLAD - FDUS
79%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
More

OXSQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXSQ has been loosely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXSQ jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXSQ
1D Price
Change %
OXSQ100%
-1.30%
PFLT - OXSQ
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
FDUS - OXSQ
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
BBDC - OXSQ
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
SCM - OXSQ
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
FSK - OXSQ
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More