Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDVAX vs RERGX
FDVAX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FDVAX vs RERGX
FDVAX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDVAX vs. RERGX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDVAX is a Buy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FDVAX (1.83B). RERGX pays higher dividends than FDVAX: RERGX (2.78) vs FDVAX (1.23). FDVAX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FDVAX (28 years) vs RERGX (17 years). FDVAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FDVAX (46.00). FDVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FDVAX (0) vs RERGX (250). FDVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. RERGX (8.25). FDVAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.46 vs. RERGX (-0.91).
| FDVAX | RERGX | FDVAX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.47 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.47 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.299 | 7.742 | 211% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 137B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 2.78 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 8.25 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.30 | 29.34 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.46 | -0.91 | -488% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.46 | 50.00 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers