Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDVAX vs RERGX
FDVAX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FDVAX vs RERGX
FDVAX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDVAX vs. RERGX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDVAX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FDVAX (1.87B). RERGX pays higher dividends than FDVAX: RERGX (2.76) vs FDVAX (1.21). FDVAX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FDVAX (28 years) vs RERGX (17 years). FDVAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FDVAX (46.00). FDVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FDVAX (0) vs RERGX (250). FDVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.93 vs. RERGX (3.60). FDVAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.43 vs. RERGX (-3.85).
| FDVAX | RERGX | FDVAX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.47 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.47 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.709 | 3.087 | 379% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 141B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.76 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 3.60 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.30 | 19.68 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.43 | -3.85 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.27 | 48.91 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers