Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDVKX vs RMEBX
FDVKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDVKX vs RMEBX
FDVKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDVKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDVKX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FDVKX (119M). FDVKX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FDVKX (1.45) vs RMEBX (0.99). FDVKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FDVKX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FDVKX (0.45). FDVKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FDVKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FDVKX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FDVKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.59 vs. RMEBX (6.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. FDVKX (19.05).
| FDVKX | RMEBX | FDVKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.593 | 8.295 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.99 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.59 | 6.28 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.38 | 34.96 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.05 | 34.49 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement