Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs RGACX
FDYNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
FDYNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FDYNX (28.5B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FDYNX: RGACX (0.07) vs FDYNX (0.00). FDYNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDYNX (29 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FDYNX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYNX (11.94). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: RGACX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). FDYNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.46 vs. RGACX (17.83). FDYNX return over 5 years is better than : 63.23 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| FDYNX | RGACX | FDYNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.682 | 15.516 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.5B | 332B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.46 | 17.83 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.53 | 58.53 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.23 | 40.02 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.43 | 95.93 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement