Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs RGACX
FDYNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FDYNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FDYNX (28.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FDYNX: RGACX (0.07) vs FDYNX (0.00). FDYNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDYNX (29 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FDYNX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYNX (11.94). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: RGACX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). FDYNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.48 vs. RGACX (14.08). FDYNX return over 5 years is better than : 64.35 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| FDYNX | RGACX | FDYNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.583 | 14.044 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 329B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.48 | 14.08 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.10 | 41.19 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.35 | 41.95 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 256.60 | 83.68 | 307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement