Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs RGACX
FDYNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs RGACX
FDYNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDYNX (28.6B). FDYNX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDYNX (30 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FDYNX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYNX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: RGACX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. FDYNX (-6.29). FDYNX return over 5 years is better than : 11.64 vs. RGACX (10.82).
| FDYNX | RGACX | FDYNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.93 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.93 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.686 | 8.819 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -0.53 | 1,184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.85 | 40.68 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.64 | 10.82 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 251.37 | 101.31 | 248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement