Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs RGAFX
FDYNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs RGAFX
FDYNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDYNX (28.6B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FDYNX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FDYNX (0.00). FDYNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FDYNX (30 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FDYNX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYNX (29.61). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: RGAFX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. FDYNX (-6.29). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. FDYNX (11.64).
| FDYNX | RGAFX | FDYNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.34 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.34 | 447% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.686 | 9.276 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | 0.42 | -1,503% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.85 | 44.36 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.64 | 14.74 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 251.37 | 109.80 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement