Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs RGAGX
FDYNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs RGAGX
FDYNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDYNX (30B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FDYNX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FDYNX (0.00). FDYNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FDYNX (30 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FDYNX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYNX (29.61). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: RGAGX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FDYNX (10.70). FDYNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.61 vs. RGAGX (20.99).
| FDYNX | RGAGX | FDYNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.29 | 524% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.29 | 524% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.360 | 8.887 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.70 | 12.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.88 | 50.34 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.61 | 20.99 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 296.66 | 122.10 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement