Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs RGACX
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs RGACX
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDYZX (28.9B). FDYZX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDYZX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.52). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYZX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: RGACX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.60 vs. RGACX (6.75). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.29 vs. RGACX (13.69).
| FDYZX | RGACX | FDYZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.484 | 6.791 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.9B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | 6.75 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.97 | 44.67 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.29 | 13.69 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 356.98 | 113.90 | 313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement