Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FECMX vs RNWBX
FECMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FECMX vs RNWBX
FECMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FECMX (11.7B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than FECMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs FECMX (0.04). FECMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FECMX (5 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FECMX (0.87). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FECMX (31.00). FECMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FECMX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FECMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.01 vs. RNWBX (18.14). FECMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| FECMX | RNWBX | FECMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.66 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.66 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.194 | 12.082 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 90.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.41 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.01 | 18.14 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.46 | 39.22 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.14 | 9.30 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement