Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FECMX vs RNWHX
FECMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FECMX vs RNWHX
FECMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. FECMX (11.5B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FECMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FECMX (0.04). FECMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FECMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FECMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FECMX (31.00). FECMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FECMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FECMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.71 vs. RNWHX (29.50). FECMX return over 5 years is better than : 33.64 vs. RNWHX (19.26).
| FECMX | RNWHX | FECMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.72 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.72 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.061 | 16.719 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 85.6B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.71 | 29.50 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.47 | 56.33 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.64 | 19.26 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement