Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FECMX vs RNWHX
FECMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FECMX vs RNWHX
FECMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FECMX (11.5B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FECMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FECMX (0.04). FECMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FECMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FECMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FECMX (31.00). FECMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FECMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FECMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.12 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FECMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.11 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FECMX | RNWHX | FECMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.72 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.72 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.891 | 18.743 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.12 | 31.15 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.07 | 57.37 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.11 | 20.21 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement