Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDAX vs RNWFX
FEDAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEDAX vs RNWFX
FEDAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FEDAX (1.51B). FEDAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: FEDAX (2.40) vs RNWFX (1.19). FEDAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEDAX (15 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FEDAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDAX (38.00). FEDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEDAX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.66 vs. RNWFX (19.68). FEDAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.52 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| FEDAX | RNWFX | FEDAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.62 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.62 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.023 | 12.700 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.19 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.66 | 19.68 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.88 | 44.28 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.52 | 14.77 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.80 | 110.07 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers