Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDAX vs RNWHX
FEDAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEDAX vs RNWHX
FEDAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FEDAX (1.51B). FEDAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FEDAX (2.40) vs RNWHX (1.14). FEDAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEDAX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEDAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDAX (38.00). FEDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEDAX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.66 vs. RNWHX (19.47). FEDAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.52 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| FEDAX | RNWHX | FEDAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.72 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.72 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.023 | 12.651 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.14 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.66 | 19.47 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.88 | 43.67 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.52 | 14.04 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.80 | 107.31 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement