Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDAX vs RNWHX
FEDAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEDAX vs RNWHX
FEDAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FEDAX (1.51B). FEDAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FEDAX (2.40) vs RNWHX (1.15). FEDAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEDAX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEDAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDAX (38.00). FEDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEDAX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.26 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FEDAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.12 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FEDAX | RNWHX | FEDAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.72 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.72 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.335 | 18.743 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 90.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.15 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.26 | 31.15 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.94 | 57.37 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.12 | 20.21 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.42 | 132.48 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement