Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDGX vs RNWBX
FEDGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FEDGX vs RNWBX
FEDGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FEDGX (1.51B). FEDGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FEDGX (1.73) vs RNWBX (0.41). FEDGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FEDGX (15 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). FEDGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDGX (38.00). FEDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FEDGX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FEDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.63 vs. RNWBX (18.14). FEDGX return over 5 years is better than : 28.19 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| FEDGX | RNWBX | FEDGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.66 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.66 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.491 | 12.082 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 0.41 | 420% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.63 | 18.14 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.35 | 39.22 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.19 | 9.30 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.39 | 97.97 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement