Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDGX vs RNWHX
FEDGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEDGX vs RNWHX
FEDGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDGX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FEDGX (1.51B). FEDGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FEDGX (1.73) vs RNWHX (1.15). FEDGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEDGX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEDGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDGX (38.00). FEDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEDGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.10 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FEDGX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FEDGX | RNWHX | FEDGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.863 | 18.743 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 90.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.15 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.10 | 31.15 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.16 | 57.37 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | 20.21 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.97 | 132.48 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement