Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDGX vs RNWHX
FEDGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEDGX vs RNWHX
FEDGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FEDGX (1.51B). FEDGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FEDGX (1.73) vs RNWHX (1.14). FEDGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEDGX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEDGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDGX (38.00). FEDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEDGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.63 vs. RNWHX (19.47). FEDGX return over 5 years is better than : 28.19 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| FEDGX | RNWHX | FEDGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.72 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.491 | 12.651 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 90.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.14 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.63 | 19.47 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.35 | 43.67 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.19 | 14.04 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.39 | 107.31 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement