Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDIX vs RNWHX
FEDIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEDIX vs RNWHX
FEDIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FEDIX (1.57B). FEDIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FEDIX (2.40) vs RNWHX (1.15). FEDIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEDIX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEDIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDIX (38.00). FEDIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEDIX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEDIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.14 vs. RNWHX (14.38). FEDIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.85 vs. RNWHX (17.86).
| FEDIX | RNWHX | FEDIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.961 | 15.501 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 90B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 1.15 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.14 | 14.38 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.29 | 53.84 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.85 | 17.86 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.30 | 107.50 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers