Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDMX vs RNWHX
FEDMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEDMX vs RNWHX
FEDMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FEDMX (11.5B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FEDMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FEDMX (0.00). FEDMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEDMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEDMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEDMX (31.00). FEDMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEDMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEDMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.71 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FEDMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.20 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FEDMX | RNWHX | FEDMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.728 | 18.743 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.71 | 31.15 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.58 | 57.37 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.20 | 20.21 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement