Advertisement
FEED vs NVST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEED is a StrongBuy and NVST is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FEED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FEED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NVST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FEED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FEED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- NVST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FEED (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -11.54% price change this week, while NVST (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -4.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
NVST is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+7.62% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-2.39% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| FEED | NVST | FEED / NVST | |
| Capitalization | 2.8M | 4.27B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -12.59M | 388M | -3% |
| Gain YTD | -80.182 | 20.774 | -386% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 63.95 | - |
| Revenue | 2.18M | 2.81B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2.24M | 1.08B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.21M | 1.59B | 0% |
FEED | NVST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FEED's Valuation (16) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVST (61) in the null industry. This means that FEED’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVST’s over the last 12 months.
FEED's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as NVST (100) in the null industry. This means that FEED’s stock grew similarly to NVST’s over the last 12 months.
NVST's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as FEED (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that NVST’s stock grew similarly to FEED’s over the last 12 months.
NVST's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FEED (95) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that NVST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FEED’s over the last 12 months.
NVST's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FEED (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that NVST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FEED’s over the last 12 months.
| FEED | NVST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 7 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 67% |
Advertisement
FEED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FEED has been loosely correlated with CLPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FEED jumps, then CLPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FEED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEED | 100% | -13.30% | ||
| CLPT - FEED | 33% Loosely correlated | -5.66% | ||
| CDNA - FEED | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| SENS - FEED | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.67% | ||
| NVST - FEED | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| BLFS - FEED | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||