Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEEFX vs RWMFX
FEEFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FEEFX vs RWMFX
FEEFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. FEEFX (173B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FEEFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs FEEFX (0.80). FEEFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FEEFX (6 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FEEFX (0.33) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FEEFX (26.00). FEEFX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FEEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.34 vs. RWMFX (8.10). FEEFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.07 vs. RWMFX (26.71).
| FEEFX | RWMFX | FEEFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.31 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.31 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.248 | 5.575 | 274% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173B | 214B | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.34 | 8.10 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.62 | 33.11 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.07 | 26.71 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement