Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEHAX vs NHCCX
FEHAX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FEHAX vs NHCCX
FEHAX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEHAX vs. NHCCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEHAX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FEHAX (7.37B). FEHAX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: FEHAX (6.04) vs NHCCX (4.72). FEHAX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FEHAX (15 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FEHAX (1.58). FEHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. NHCCX (15.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEHAX: NHCCX (200) vs FEHAX (2500). NHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.32 vs. FEHAX (6.83). FEHAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.72 vs. NHCCX (-5.36).
| FEHAX | NHCCX | FEHAX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 2.80 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 2.80 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.279 | 1.538 | 148% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 200 | 1,250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.37B | 12.5B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.04 | 4.72 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.83 | 8.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.30 | 9.15 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.72 | -5.36 | -256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.65 | 14.21 | 342% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers