Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEHAX vs NHMAX
FEHAX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts FEHAX vs NHMAX
FEHAX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEHAX vs. NHMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEHAX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. FEHAX (7.31B). FEHAX pays higher dividends than NHMAX: FEHAX (5.94) vs NHMAX (5.42). FEHAX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: FEHAX (14 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FEHAX (1.58). FEHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. NHMAX (18.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FEHAX (3%) vs FEHAX (3%). FEHAX (2500) and NHMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. FEHAX (4.05). FEHAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.50 vs. NHMAX (1.60).
| FEHAX | NHMAX | FEHAX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 2.00 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 2.00 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.666 | 3.092 | 86% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.31B | 12.7B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.94 | 5.42 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.05 | 9.31 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.51 | 12.15 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.50 | 1.60 | 1,031% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.01 | 25.26 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement