Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEHAX vs NHMAX
FEHAX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts FEHAX vs NHMAX
FEHAX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEHAX vs. NHMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEHAX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. FEHAX (7.4B). FEHAX pays higher dividends than NHMAX: FEHAX (6.04) vs NHMAX (5.52). FEHAX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: FEHAX (15 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FEHAX (1.58). FEHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FEHAX (3%) vs FEHAX (3%). FEHAX (2500) and NHMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. FEHAX (6.70). FEHAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.65 vs. NHMAX (-1.39).
| FEHAX | NHMAX | FEHAX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 2.00 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 2.00 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.765 | 1.650 | 107% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.4B | 12.4B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.04 | 5.52 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | 8.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.59 | 14.45 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.65 | -1.39 | -985% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.05 | 21.38 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers