Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEHCX vs NHMAX
FEHCX vs NHMAX Comparison
Open Charts FEHCX vs NHMAX
FEHCX vs NHMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEHCX vs. NHMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEHCX is a Hold and NHMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. FEHCX (7.31B). NHMAX (5.42) and FEHCX (5.18) have matching dividends . FEHCX was incepted earlier than NHMAX: FEHCX (14 years) vs NHMAX (27 years). FEHCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than NHMAX (2.00). FEHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. NHMAX (18.00). FEHCX (2500) and NHMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. FEHCX (3.27). FEHCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.17 vs. NHMAX (1.60).
| FEHCX | NHMAX | FEHCX / NHMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 2.00 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 2.00 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.214 | 3.092 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.31B | 12.7B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.18 | 5.42 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.27 | 9.31 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.82 | 12.15 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.17 | 1.60 | 760% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.89 | 25.26 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers