Franklin Electric (FELE) and Flowserve (FLS) are key players in the industrial pumps and fluid handling equipment sector, serving applications in water management, energy, and manufacturing. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning amid ongoing industrial sector trends like infrastructure spending and energy transitions. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors focused on dividend stability or growth potential in cyclical industrials will find value in understanding their relative strengths, risks, and AI-driven insights for informed decision-making in the current market environment.
Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) designs, manufactures, and distributes water and fuel pumping systems across its Water Systems, Energy Systems, and Distribution segments. The company caters to residential, agricultural, municipal, industrial, and energy markets globally. In recent market activity, FELE shares have demonstrated steady upward momentum, trading around $102 with a 52-week range of $83 to $112 and year-to-date gains of approximately 7%. Key influences include robust Q1 2026 results announced in late April, featuring 10% net sales growth to $500.4 million driven by volume, pricing, and acquisitions, alongside adjusted diluted EPS of $0.83, up 24% year-over-year. The company reaffirmed its full-year 2026 guidance for sales between $2.17 billion and $2.24 billion and adjusted EPS of $4.40 to $4.60. Positive sentiment stems from strong demand in groundwater and wastewater applications, offset somewhat by material cost pressures, supporting a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 30.7 and dividend yield of 1.1%.
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is a leading provider of engineered flow control solutions, including pumps, valves, seals, and related services for industries such as oil and gas, chemicals, power generation, and water management. In recent weeks, FLS stock has exhibited strong momentum, trading near $85 within a 52-week range of $43 to $92, reflecting significant gains from prior lows. Performance has been bolstered by anticipation and delivery of solid Q1 2026 results in late April, with adjusted EPS growth of 18% despite a 7% sales dip attributed to Middle East disruptions. Margin expansion highlighted operational efficiency. Investor interest has risen with reports of activist involvement from Starboard Value, contributing to positive sentiment. Key metrics include a trailing P/E of 32.2, ROE (return on equity) of 17.2%, and dividend yield of 1.0%, amid a larger market cap underscoring scale advantages.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers curated from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots employ machine learning for real-time signals, delivering impressive stats such as annualized returns ranging from 38% to over 160%, win rates of 50-74%, profit factors up to 7.0, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10 in many cases. Focused on high-volatility sectors like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and small caps, they adapt to current trends with varying styles from swing trading to short-term scalps. Only the most suitable for prevailing market dynamics earn a trending spot, helping users identify opportunities efficiently. Explore these bots to enhance your trading with data-driven automation.
Both FELE and FLS share sector exposure in fluid handling for industrial and energy applications, but FLS emphasizes broader flow control with valves and services, while FELE focuses on pumping systems. Growth drivers differ: FLS benefits from larger scale and higher ROE (17.2% vs. 11.5%), supporting aggressive expansion, whereas FELE leverages stable water infrastructure demand. Recent momentum favors FLS with sharper recoveries, though FELE shows consistent YTD gains. Risk factors include FLS's elevated debt-to-equity (78% vs. 22%) and beta (1.34 vs. 1.07), indicating higher volatility. Market sentiment is upbeat for both post-earnings, with FLS drawing activist attention for potential catalysts.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FLS due to its superior scale, higher ROE, and sustained momentum in recent industrial sector uptrends, positioning it better for potential outperformance amid economic recovery signals. However, FELE appeals for stability seekers with lower risk metrics and reliable guidance. Outcomes depend on broader market conditions and sector catalysts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FELE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FELE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FELE (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -3.31% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.66%.
FELE is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
FLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| FELE | FLS | FELE / FLS | |
| Capitalization | 4.3B | 8.86B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 275M | 710M | 39% |
| Gain YTD | 2.484 | 0.375 | 662% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.33 | 25.53 | 115% |
| Revenue | 2.18B | 4.65B | 47% |
| Total Cash | 80.4M | 792M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 291M | 1.89B | 15% |
FELE | FLS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLS's Valuation (63) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FELE (68). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to FELE’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FELE (57). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to FELE’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's SMR Rating (52) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FELE (65). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to FELE’s over the last 12 months.
FELE's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (61). This means that FELE’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
FELE's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (41). This means that FELE’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
| FELE | FLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 59% | 17 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | 100% | -1.89% | ||
| FELE - FLS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| ATMU - FLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| ITT - FLS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| LECO - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| KMT - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
More | ||||