FELG
Price
$43.86
Change
-$0.12 (-0.27%)
Updated
Aug 20, 12:14 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VUG
Price
$87.41
Change
-$0.52 (-0.59%)
Updated
Aug 20, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
371.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FELG vs VUG

FELG vs VUG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 16, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) vs. Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF (VUG)

Key Takeaways

  • FELG employs an active, research-driven strategy targeting large-cap growth stocks from the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VUG passively tracks the Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index.
  • FELG carries a higher expense ratio of 0.18% compared to VUG’s 0.03%, reflecting its active management approach versus VUG’s low-cost index replication.
  • Both ETFs maintain concentrated exposure to technology and communication services sectors, with overlapping top holdings such as NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft, though FELG’s active selection may lead to modest deviations in weighting.
  • VUG offers greater scale and liquidity as a long-established passive fund, whereas FELG provides potential for enhanced returns through factor-based research but with higher fees and non-diversified structure.
  • Structural differences position FELG as a thematic active complement and VUG as a core passive holding for investors seeking broad large-cap growth exposure.
  • In recent market cycles, both have benefited from growth stock momentum driven by earnings strength in leading technology names, though relative performance hinges on active stock selection versus index tracking efficiency.

Introduction

Investors seeking large-cap growth exposure frequently evaluate passive index trackers against actively managed alternatives. FELG and VUG both target U.S. large-cap growth equities but differ in management style, cost, and potential return drivers. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer alternative approaches to similar investor goals of capital appreciation through growth-oriented companies. The comparison highlights structural distinctions relevant amid ongoing sector rotation and earnings cycles in technology-heavy segments.

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) Overview

FELG is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that invests at least 80% of assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The fund uses a research-driven approach focused on long-term drivers such as valuation, growth, and quality factors. It holds approximately 150 securities and maintains a non-diversified structure. Top holdings typically include major technology names such as NVIDIA, Alphabet, Apple, Broadcom, and Microsoft. Sector allocations emphasize information technology and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.18%. Distinguishing features include active enhancement within a growth index framework and a focus on identifying stocks with favorable return characteristics.

Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF (VUG) Overview

VUG is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Morningstar US Large Cap Growth Index. The fund employs an indexing approach and invests at least 80% of net assets in the stocks comprising the target index. It holds approximately 150 securities with broad diversification within the large-cap growth segment. Top holdings commonly feature NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon. Sector allocations concentrate in information technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio is 0.03%. Key characteristics include low-cost passive replication, high liquidity, and consistent exposure to growth factors as defined by the index provider.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity market, where technology and innovation-driven companies dominate. Capital flows have favored growth equities during periods of earnings expansion and favorable interest rate expectations. Macroeconomic drivers include corporate spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure, semiconductor demand, and digital transformation initiatives. Sector risks encompass valuation compression if growth expectations moderate, regulatory scrutiny in technology, and sensitivity to shifts in monetary policy. Recent market cycles have highlighted the resilience of leading growth names amid evolving economic conditions, supporting continued investor interest in this thematic area.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both FELG and VUG have reflected broader growth stock dynamics tied to earnings reports from top technology holdings and sector rotation patterns. VUG’s passive structure delivers returns closely aligned with its benchmark, offering predictability during market upswings. FELG’s active management introduces potential for outperformance through selective factor tilts but may also result in tracking variations. Relative positioning shows VUG benefiting from scale and minimal costs during extended growth cycles, while FELG may capture incremental alpha in environments favoring quality or growth signals. Volatility differences remain modest given overlapping holdings, though active decisions can influence short-term deviations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF and equity research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor VUG with moderate probability. The ETF’s significantly lower expense ratio, passive index tracking consistency, and established liquidity profile provide a cost-efficient and reliable vehicle for large-cap growth exposure. While FELG offers active enhancement potential, the higher fees and non-diversified nature introduce additional considerations relative to VUG’s benchmark-aligned approach in prevailing market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
FELG vs. VUG commentary
Aug 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FELG is a Hold and VUG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VUG has more net assets: 372B vs. FELG (5.77B). VUG has a higher annual dividend yield than FELG: VUG (8.143) vs FELG (5.674). FELG was incepted earlier than VUG: FELG (19 years) vs VUG (23 years). VUG (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than FELG (0.18). FELG has a higher turnover VUG (12.00) vs VUG (12.00).
FELGVUGFELG / VUG
Gain YTD5.6748.14370%
Net Assets5.77B372B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.180.03600%
Turnover60.0012.00500%
Yield0.360.4091%
Fund Existence19 years23 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FELGVUG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FELG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VUG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVDS60.880.10
+0.17%
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lrg ValETF
MAGO22.70N/A
N/A
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
TMFC79.05-0.07
-0.09%
Motley Fool 100 ETF
CAML40.74-0.18
-0.43%
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
TSLZ13.29-1.25
-8.60%
T-REX 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF

FELG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FELG has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FELG jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FELG
1D Price
Change %
FELG100%
-0.48%
AVGO - FELG
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
LRCX - FELG
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.33%
TSLA - FELG
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.23%
AMD - FELG
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.71%
KLAC - FELG
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
More

VUG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VUG has been closely correlated with RVTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VUG jumps, then RVTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VUG
1D Price
Change %
VUG100%
+0.08%
RVTY - VUG
70%
Closely correlated
+5.01%
AVGO - VUG
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
GOOG - VUG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
GOOGL - VUG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
SWKS - VUG
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More