Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMAX vs FTHFX
FEMAX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMAX vs FTHFX
FEMAX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FEMAX (81.3M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FEMAX: FTHFX (0.59) vs FEMAX (0.09). FEMAX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FEMAX (4 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FEMAX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.26 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FEMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FEMAX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.40 vs. FTHFX (30.99).
| FEMAX | FTHFX | FEMAX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.64 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.64 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.935 | 12.922 | 239% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3M | 11.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.59 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.40 | 30.99 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.82 | 61.63 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 61.64 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 248.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SMDVX | 20.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps A | |||
| FKASX | 50.29 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A | |||
| SBSIX | 15.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ins | |||
| LSCNX | 24.06 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value N | |||
| CGVGX | 31.25 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| American Funds Global Insight 529-F-2 | |||