Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMAX vs NAESX
FEMAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FEMAX vs NAESX
FEMAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FEMAX (81.3M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FEMAX: NAESX (1.08) vs FEMAX (0.09). FEMAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FEMAX (4 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FEMAX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.26 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEMAX: NAESX (0) vs FEMAX (2500). FEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.40 vs. NAESX (27.66).
| FEMAX | NAESX | FEMAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.17 | 1,241% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.935 | 15.348 | 202% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.08 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.40 | 27.66 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.82 | 57.38 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 33.59 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 172.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SMDVX | 20.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps A | |||
| FKASX | 50.29 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A | |||
| SBSIX | 15.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ins | |||
| LSCNX | 24.06 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value N | |||
| CGVGX | 31.25 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| American Funds Global Insight 529-F-2 | |||