Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWEX
FEMKX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWEX
FEMKX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWEX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Buy and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FEMKX (11.5B). RNWEX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWEX (0.97) vs FEMKX (0.04). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FEMKX (36 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FEMKX (0.86). RNWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEMKX (31.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.71 vs. RNWEX (23.48). FEMKX return over 5 years is better than : 29.46 vs. RNWEX (14.54).
| FEMKX | RNWEX | FEMKX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.92 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.92 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.338 | 14.048 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.97 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.71 | 23.48 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.76 | 48.89 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.46 | 14.54 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.17 | 121.25 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement